Re: [s-d] [s-b] Jury, second try

ihope on Sun, 6 Apr 2008 11:55:16 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Jury, second try

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Jury, second try
From: ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:55:10 -0400
In-reply-to: <613206.42407.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <613206.42407.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 06/04/2008, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Billy Pilgrim, Hose, and 0x44, you may now begin your deliberations.

Unless this assignment (or this whole thing) is disputed somehow, I
guess that means we know that Billy Pilgrim, Hose and 0x44 aren't the
Offender.

--Ivan Hope CXXVII
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Jury, second try
  - From: Justin Ahmann

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Jury, second try
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Silliness
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Jury, second try
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Silliness
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread