Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal - Enough Tomfoolery

0x44 on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:20:08 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal - Enough Tomfoolery

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal - Enough Tomfoolery
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:19:59 -0600
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650802192154q8e04636x4323506bdfd19222@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44e5a2650802192154q8e04636x4323506bdfd19222@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022)

I would like to point out that your revision is not reflected in the 
Refresh Proposals on the Wiki. If your refresh proposal passes 
unrevised, no one will be able to usurp ministries.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal - Enough Tomfoolery
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Claim on consultation 116
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal - Enough Tomfoolery
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Claim on consultation 116
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal - Enough Tomfoolery
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread