Re: [s-d] A question for the 3 noids

Mike McGann on Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:38:34 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] A question for the 3 noids

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] A question for the 3 noids
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:38:31 -0500
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650802160939w6bdf49a2y8d7d116768f85df2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44e5a2650802160939w6bdf49a2y8d7d116768f85df2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Feb 16, 2008 12:39 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is the reason for your panic a problem with the ruleset itself, or is
> it merely that you seek ratification of an uncertain gamestate?

Nah, just wanted things to slow down a little.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] A question for the 3 noids
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hmm Part 2
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] bot request
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] A question for the 3 noids
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Chess
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread