Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hmm Part 2

ihope on Sun, 17 Feb 2008 07:54:38 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hmm Part 2

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hmm Part 2
From: ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:54:33 -0500
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650802162041u14d8fa57k2fd065baa3509ab9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <214009.53780.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650802162041u14d8fa57k2fd065baa3509ab9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 16/02/2008, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Oh, it was ttpf. And so was Hose's message, so he just became calm.
> That not official comment text had zero effect.

Is there a Rule stating that messages to a Public Forum are Game Documents?

--Ivan Hope CXXVII
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hmm Part 2
  - From: Justin Ahmann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hmm Part 2
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hmm Part 2
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Chess
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hmm Part 2
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Is this really Urgent?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread