Antonio Dolcetta on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:47:57 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Murder most foul |
On 11 Feb 2008, at 17:39, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Feb 11, 2008 11:21 AM, Antonio Dolcetta > <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 11 Feb 2008, at 17:04, ihope wrote: >> >>> On 11/02/2008, Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> The court therefore finds the players Ivan Hope, Codae and Billy >>>> Pilgrim guilty of Manslaughter >>> >>> You can't do that. >>> >>> >> >> I think I can and should. >> I interpret the question as being about the murder in it's whole, not >> about 0x44 specifically >> >> The question was: "did player X murder player Y" ? I should obviously >> be interpreted as: "did player X kill player Y, if not who did ? did >> he act alone ?" > > Rule 4E54 only allows for conviction by a Yes Answer to a question of > a specific Player's guilt. Anything other than a Yes in response to a > question about such guilt has no effect, whether you claim it does or > not. Ok, so I fucked up. Sorry. forget the punishment then, it's illegal to submit it together with the answer anyway. It has to be submitted when it becomes pondered. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss