Antonio Dolcetta on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:47:57 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Murder most foul


On 11 Feb 2008, at 17:39, Geoffrey Spear wrote:

> On Feb 11, 2008 11:21 AM, Antonio Dolcetta  
> <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 11 Feb 2008, at 17:04, ihope wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/02/2008, Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> The court therefore finds the players Ivan Hope, Codae and Billy
>>>> Pilgrim guilty of Manslaughter
>>>
>>> You can't do that.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I think I can and should.
>> I interpret the question as being about the murder in it's whole, not
>> about 0x44 specifically
>>
>> The question was: "did player X murder player Y" ? I should obviously
>> be interpreted as: "did player X kill player Y, if not who did ? did
>> he act alone ?"
>
> Rule 4E54 only allows for conviction by a Yes Answer to a question of
> a specific Player's guilt.  Anything other than a Yes in response to a
> question about such guilt has no effect, whether you claim it does or
> not.

Ok, so I fucked up. Sorry.

forget the punishment then, it's illegal to submit it together with  
the answer anyway. It has to be submitted when it becomes pondered.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss