Geoffrey Spear on Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:47:41 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Ordainment |
On Feb 9, 2008 2:18 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Feb 9, 2008 1:41 PM, Charles Schaefer <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I like it too. But maybe there should be some encouragement (maybe in the > > form of macks or points for answering consultations) for people to keep > > themselves ordained. > > > > I think any kind of rewards for being a Priest would have a negative impact. > The encouragement should be to keep the game going. Awarding points or macks > can get messy and can lead to these kind of things: "I haven't been picked > as a priest in a long time and I have bills to pay!", "Why did you ZOT that? > 25 macks wasted!" Adapting something akin to Agora's Standing Court could eliminate that. As it is, the MoQ wields quite a bit of power by being able to choose his favored Priests over and over and pass over anyone who he disagrees with. I believe that BobTHJ is selecting priests randomly but I don't think any previous MoQs have claimed to or appeared to do the same. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss