Re: [s-d] RFC: phenotypes proposal

Ed Murphy on Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:41:23 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] RFC: phenotypes proposal

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] RFC: phenotypes proposal
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:38:28 -0800
In-reply-to: <285c99840802081009k692c5307w925d410d67628d41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <984979.50195.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7db5cba20801111325y8a44858ge1b8773471d88e3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840802081009k692c5307w925d410d67628d41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Charles wrote:

> What are 5 and 2 supposed to represent?

Their true purpose is sinister.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] RFC: phenotypes proposal
  - From: Charles Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] RFC: phenotypes proposal
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Out of bounds
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] RFC: phenotypes proposal
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Wickedness.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread