ihope on Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:00:42 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization

On 07/02/2008, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I claim this answer is INCONSISTENT with doctrine.
> >
> > why ?
> Because it destroys a Proposal and a Consultation, which is a blatant
> abuse of the Oracularity system.

How would you have answered it, then?

--Ivan Hope CXXVII
spoon-discuss mailing list