Justin Ahmann on Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:00:56 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization |
Shouldn't there be a period at the end? Codae ----- Original Message ---- From: Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2008 5:50:35 PM Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Rule Categorization On Feb 6, 2008 11:19 AM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Feb 6, 2008 1:06 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Enough Already! > > { > > Repeal all rules except for 4E1 through 4E40 and 4E42 through 4E100 > > } > > > > Repeal Rule 0? That one is kind of important. > Blame it on Murphy. I just plagiarized the thing. I revise the proposal titled "Enough Already!" to read: { Repeal all rules except for 4E0 through 4E40 and 4E42 through 4E100 } BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss