Justin Ahmann on Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:42:29 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic |
It was possible. The message to the Public Forum creating "Random Rule Destruction" occured before Rule 41 became taboo. Codae ----- Original Message ---- From: Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2008 7:13:31 PM Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic On 2/5/08, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Any particular reason? The Random Rule Destruction makes me unofficially > paranoid. Me too. Since this is the discussion forum, I will ask: Is Rule 4E41 essential? The proposal said to make it essential if possible, but I'm not sure whether that was possible or not. Hmmm, come to think of it, it doesn't really matter, at least for what we're doing with essentialness right now... If the beast tries to eat 4e41, he just won't be able to cause he can't name it. MoF BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss