Re: [s-d] [s-b] field action

[Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Good point.

Codae



----- Original Message ----
From: Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2008 11:54:37 AM
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] field action


On 5 Feb 2008, at 17:06, Ed Murphy wrote:

> Antonio Dolcetta wrote:
>
>> On 5 Feb 2008, at 16:50, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>
>>> I Purchase.
>>>
>>
>> ROFL
>
> Consultation:  Are there an infinite number of kings?
>
> (Arguably, the repetition in Initialize doesn't proceed until the
> Referee actually chooses the next batch of random numbers, in which
> case the current match could be salvaged by way of the Referee
> intentionally failing to do so.)


I'd like to point out to the priest this consultation gets assigned  
to that there is no concept of "adjacency" defined for Field Objects  
other than squares. So two Kings can never be adjacent.
This is a bug I intend to fix very soon, but for now we might have 21  
Kings.



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss