Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:58:47 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: A Real Paradox This Time

On Jan 28, 2008 7:44 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit the following Consultation:
> {
> At the beginning of nday 8, nweek 134, would it have been possible for the Player named Peter to claim Consultation 43 Consistent?
> Reasoning: There have been two nday 8, nweek 134s--one before ZOTTING the Consultation, and the other afterward.
> }

Gratuitous argument: the ability to create a Consultation using
language that doesn't unambiguously describe the particulars of the
game action in question doesn't constitute a paradox.  I move that the
Priest request a ZOTTING on the grounds that the Question is unclear
but not paradoxical.

spoon-discuss mailing list