Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: A Real Paradox This Time

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 28, 2008 7:44 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit the following Consultation:
> {
> At the beginning of nday 8, nweek 134, would it have been possible for the Player named Peter to claim Consultation 43 Consistent?
>
> Reasoning: There have been two nday 8, nweek 134s--one before ZOTTING the Consultation, and the other afterward.
> }

Gratuitous argument: the ability to create a Consultation using
language that doesn't unambiguously describe the particulars of the
game action in question doesn't constitute a paradox.  I move that the
Priest request a ZOTTING on the grounds that the Question is unclear
but not paradoxical.

--Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss