Jamie Dallaire on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:20:04 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposals |
On Jan 25, 2008 8:13 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Roger Hicks wrote: > > Instant Vacations > > { > > Amend rule 4e46 to read: > > {{ > > A Player may, as a Game Action, assign a vacant Ministry to himself, > > unless he has previously held that Ministry this nweek. > > }} > > } > > > > This is to prevent ministers from re-setting the retainers of their > > ministries back to 50 by vacating and then re-taking a ministry. > > > If a Minister were to do that, they wouldn't be paid for their service > that nweek. It seems a fair trade-off to me. Unless that minister pulled that switch on nday 1 before the clock were turned on. I think the proposal is great as it is, as something along the lines of resetting retainer to what it was before ministry was vacated might just be confusing and awkward. The change I'd like to see is to have anyone prevented from re-taking a ministry that they vacated this nweek, rather than a ministry that they held this nweek. That way, If I held the MoX and were usurped, and this were followed by the usurper vacating, I would be able to take it back. Billy Pilgrim _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss