Re: [s-d] [s-b] Revise proposal #309

[antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx]

On 23 Jan 2008, at 17:53, Roger Hicks wrote:


> Invokable Action: Initialize
> Trigger: A Game Action by the Referee including the starting
> locations of each Field Object placed during this action using a
> suitable method of randomization.
> Effect: If this action has never been invoked before in the current
> Field Match a King is created in the possession of each player and
> located on a random square of the Field. If any two Kings are
> adjacent, this process is repeated until no Kings are adjacent.

This is still ambiguous. I suggest: "a King is created in the possession of each player and located on random non-adjacent squares of the Field"  


> Invokable Action: Purchase
>  Trigger: A Game Action by any player who possesses a King object on
> the Field that spends X macks, where X is ten times the number of
> times this player has previously invoked this action since the Field
> was last turned
> Effect: If there are at least three unoccupied squares on the Field a
> new Field Object is created at random based upon the following
> weighted table and is placed in a random unoccupied square adjacent to
> that Player's King:

This is still broken too, you need to make sure there is at least one unoccupied square that is adjacent to that player's King, or make the action fail if there is none.



> Field Object: Pawn
> Invokable Action: Move
>  Trigger: A Game Action by the owner specifying an adjacent space in
> a cardinal direction
>  Effect: If the specified space is unoccupied the Pawn moves to that space
> Invokable Action: Capture
>  Trigger: A Game Action by the owner specifying an adjacent space in
> a diagonal direction
>  Effect: If the specified space is occupied by a Field Object
> belonging to a different player the Pawn moves to that space.

No pawn promotion ?

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss