Joel Uckelman on Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:44:54 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ministry of Time Bulletin and Consultation |
Thus spake "Mike McGann": > On Jan 23, 2008 8:26 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > My reasoning: > > Nothing in the ruleset declares a method of rounding. While bank > > rounding is the most accurate method of rounding, we aren't doing enough > > transactions to make it worthwhile. Therefore, it is understandable that > > the method of rounding defaulted to mathematical rounding. The > > mathematical round of x.5 is x+1. > > I'm not sure I would call bank rounding the most accurate. Maybe the > most fair. Banks have an interest in not losing fractions of monetary > units due to rounding. Fixed precision is used and it could basically > be integer math with a decimal point placed somewhere. Ever seen "Office Space"? I don't think anyone would notice if you just collected all of the round-off in an account... :) -- J. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss