Re: [s-d] [s-b] Various things

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 1/15/08, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure this can be answered with a clear NO.  I agree that an
> Agreement is not inherently part of the state of the game simply by
> being an Agreement, but on the other hand a Faction is an Agreement
> that is clearly, by Rule 4E43, part of the game, so if a NO answer
> means that all Agreements are not part of the state of the game then
> it's my intuition that this Question can't really be answered
> definitively.


I see what you mean and struggled with that myself, but I think my judgment
applies to factions as well as other agreements, since factions are simply a
status granted to an outsider (project, game object) that represents an
external force outside the game, rather than to the external force itself.

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss