Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 14, 2008 3:47 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [[ I really wanted this Rule to stay in because I get a laugh out if
> it, but if people insist... ]]
>
> I submit the following Consultation:
>
> {{
> Can we end the Rule 4E41 tomfoolery now?
>
> Unbeliever: 0x44
> }}
>
> I recommend the following Oracularity
> {{
> Remove all occurrences of the following text from the Rules:
> {{
> There is no Rule 4E41.
> }}
> Repeal any Rule that has no text.
> }}
> }}
>

I don't think this is necessary. If there is no rule 4E41 (according
to itself), then let's just remove it from the rules page and pretend
it never existed.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss