Re: [s-d] [s-b] change of vote

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

No one lost macks since one is only convicted of a crime if one is tried for
it (consultation). I for one am not inclined to putting Wooble on trial for
this as I didn't really want to hit anyone with it on the first nweek
especially because of the initial DNA screwup and because this blood
betrayal thing is just new. Also he repented by quickly changing his vote.

BP

On Jan 11, 2008 12:32 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ivan Hope wrote:
>
> > On Jan 7, 2008 8:06 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> To avoid blood betrayal, I change my vote on Proposal 286 to ABSTAIN.
> >
> > Looks to me that you can't avoid Blood Betrayal by changing your vote;
> > merely voting AGAINST in the first place is Blood Betrayal:
> >
> > "Voting AGAINST a Proposal whose Author is currently one's Twin
> > constitutes a Felony known as Blood Betrayal, punishable by a fine of
> > exactly m100. Committing Blood Betrayal multiple times in a given
> > nweek cannot result in more than a single punishment.
> >
> > The most recent Vote on a proposal by a Registered Voter is called
> > that Registered Voter's Final Vote on that proposal."
>
> Did anyone actually lose any macks over this?
>
> The sub-pages should be up to date now.  Proofreaders welcome, I'm
> too tired to deal with it right now.
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss