Mike McGann on Wed, 9 Jan 2008 02:47:54 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer |
On Jan 8, 2008 8:15 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Lay-persons say so, but neither accountants nor bankers do. As I stated > in a response to Billy Pilgrim, the English language allows a house to > burn up and down identically, obviously there is no innate idiomatic > meaning that is unambiguous in the choice of "Up" or "Down". > <http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss> > To "go up in smoke" is idiomatic, to have "your balance to go down" is not. Up and down is deduced from how we typically graph numerical values--it is based from some actual meaning. From where I live, I would say that I'm going up to New York or going down to Miami. The meaning of up and down is deduced from the way we typically orient our maps where North is up and down is South even if the Earth happens to be shaped like a torus. - Hose _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss