Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer

0x44 on Wed, 9 Jan 2008 01:21:36 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:21:36 -0600
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650801081557k4705eeffta8019c86990456c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <934137.40357.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47840646.3080905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650801081538p5d96935eo24d9f6eb94e7df37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47840A43.1020804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650801081544p49d17f38pc092cdad98d15eb7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47840D30.5010906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650801081557k4705eeffta8019c86990456c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

Jamie Dallaire wrote:
>
> Touché. Not defined in the rules. But just like my argument about going up
> or down by a negative amount, this depends on commonly accepted
> interpretation of english idiom.
>   
I'm not sure that's the best redoubt for you to fall back upon, after 
all English permits a house to both burn UP and burn DOWN identically.

-- 
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer
  - From: Justin Ahmann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Mackerel Transfer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread