Re: [s-d] [s-b] DNA-Free Hose

Mike McGann on Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:25:58 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] DNA-Free Hose

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] DNA-Free Hose
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:25:52 -0500
In-reply-to: <cf0c2a990801021914n90cdd02u980bccb501990c1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6d741b990801021638vf201543g10dd1d5daf847c06@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990801021914n90cdd02u980bccb501990c1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 2, 2008 10:14 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> No it doesn't.  From Rule 42: "An Agreement recognized by B Nomic is
> one that is between two or more External Forces[...]"  The agreement
> in question only has one party and as such isn't an Agreement.

Darn. I need to slow down when I read.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] DNA-Free Hose
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] DNA-Free Hose
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [MoC] Proposals 270-277
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] DNA-Free Hose
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] DNA-Free Hose
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread