Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 2:57 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> I claim Consultation 80 to be Inconsistent.
>>
>> I agree with the answer, but I think the Oracularity is a misapplication of
>> the Justice system. They should be used for fixing ambiguous issues with the
>> Rules. I don't see how this is ambiguous. There is no maximum, and 11 HP is
>> correct. Is having a maximum number of HP what the Players of B want? If so,
>> that needs to be enacted through a proposal. After all, it may be the will
>> of the Players to not have a maximum since the original RPG proposal was
>> passed that way.
>>
>>     
>
> I think this is a perfect example of Oracularity use. It is obvious
> that the intent was for the maximum HP to be 10. This Oracularity is
> simply fixing the rule to better state what it originally intended.
>
> BobTHJ
>   
I never intended the maximum HP to be 10. In the proposal that 
established healing, I purposely left out defining a maximum HP because 
I thought it better handled in future proposals.

-- 
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss