Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Internalized panic

Mike McGann on Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:54:38 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Internalized panic

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Internalized panic
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:54:34 -0500
In-reply-to: <477947BB.5030300@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <477947BB.5030300@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Could we simply define emergency procedures as meta-rules outside the game
or is that an un-nomic-ish thing to do?

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: In the Interest of Tomfoolery
Next by Date: [s-d] Loopholes, scamming, etc.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: In the Interest of Tomfoolery
Next by thread: [s-d] Loopholes, scamming, etc.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread