Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.

Mike McGann on Mon, 31 Dec 2007 11:00:14 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:00:10 -0500
In-reply-to: <200712311058.30028.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <200712311049.44989.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990712310955m64377a5cwfe823162a82fd908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200712311058.30028.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>

On Dec 31, 2007 12:58 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> That will remove the rule "Rules", which is also inconsistent. Damned if
> you
> do, damned if you don't. ;)
>
>
No it won't. Where does it specify in the Rules that this would occur?

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.
  - From: Josiah Worcester

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.
  - From: Josiah Worcester

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Yes.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread