Re: [s-d] Hurried Proposal: Super-Mutants

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

I forgot:

I Urge BobTHJ and Codae, who also intend to Hurry their current Proposals,
to Mutate to GA as I have done. My rationale is that this will allow other
Players who may want to vote against our hurried proposals greater latitude
in terms of the DNA they would like to have.

Billy Pilgrim


On 12/30/07, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In order to correct my compounded initial DNA assignation error, I submit
> the following proposal, entitled "Super-Mutants":
>
> {
> Upon adoption of this Proposal, all Players, regardless of whether or not
> they have already Mutated this nweek, are allowed to Mutate once more before
> Voting again. This proposal takes precedence over Rule 61.
>
> If the Rules state that any points are to be awarded to the author of this
> Proposal for it being Won or Passing, these points are not awarded.
>
> [[This basically serves to ensure that, as long as one mutates before
> voting on any hurried proposals, and as long as this proposal is hurried and
> passed before ballotday of this nweek, one can essentially mutate twice in
> the nweek. This means that, by ballotday, any player should be free to
> occupy any DNA space he wants, and there should not be a glut of players
> stuck in the same corner of the DNA board and unable to vote against each
> other's proposals without committing a Felony.]]
> }
>
> I Mutate to GA.
>
> With sufficient Support, I intend to HURRY this proposal.
>
> Billy Pilgrim
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss