Jamie Dallaire on Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:21:50 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] A proposal: let a President Veto proposals |
On 12/30/07, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Why? Proposals with problems can already be fixed before the voting > period starts, and if the problem is discovered after the voting > period begins everyone can change their votes to AGAINST. This would > give way too much power to one individual. I agree with Wooble. I also have a question: tell me if I am getting this right: Voting for None and voting for Nobody are two different things. The first is the equivalent of abstaining or spoiling one's ballot, whereas the second is essentially a vote in favor of not having a president. Correct? Billy Pilgrim _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss