Re: [s-d] [s-b] In case "Win by Paradox" happens

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Dec 27, 2007 2:42 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> I submit the following Consultation:
>>
>> {{
>> Is it possible to truthfully say that the Priest's answer to this Consultation will be in the affirmative, as of the time of submission of this Consultation?
>> }
>>
>> Unbeliever: Wooble
>> }
>>
>> Codae
>>     
>
> This is Consultation 73, and I ZOT it as a blatant attempt to take
> advantage of a badly-worded Paradox rule that doesn't exist yet..
> Paradoxes in the actual gamestate might be a good grounds for a win;
> the ability to submit paradoxical questions as consultations shouldn't
> be
Amusingly, there doesn't seem to be a paradox in the consultation, anyway.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss