Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 25 Dec 2007 20:59:05 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 135 |
Nope, it was ttpf. I almost submitted the same message earlier till I realized McGee's email used that sneaky "discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>" trick. On Dec 25, 2007 10:42 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > nttpf. > > Also, the proposal does not take any actions. Or maybe it does. Anyway, it effects no changes to the rules. > > Codae > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Adam Hill <adamahill@xxxxxxxxx> > To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2007 10:20:12 PM > Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Ballot for nweek 135 > > Thanks for the clarification. I somehow missed that change in the > refresh. I change my vote on Proposal 237 to FOR. > > > Cheers, > Anything McGee > > > On Dec 25, 2007 9:15 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The Registrar does not currently have the liberty to reject any > > requests. That power was stripped from the registrar in the Emergency > > before last, and replaced with the general ability of any player to > > contest another player's registration within 12ndays. My proposal > > prevents a player from registering taking an action and immediately > > forfeiting. > > > > -- > > -- > > 0x44; > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss