Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:45:50 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Blatant Bribery |
On Dec 17, 2007 11:43 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2007 9:38 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Dec 17, 2007 11:09 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I will gladly divide and pay all my macks to the players who vote FOR > > > proposal 214 (sequential rule numbering), which is on the ballot again > > > this week, if that proposal passes. > > > > Fix it to empower the MoC to change any references to rule numbers in > > Pending proposals to point to the newly-correct rule numbers (or have > > a rule allow such old rule numbers to be used to unambiguously refer > > to the rules they used to refer to) and I'll vote for it. > > > The fix I just posted should take care of this. It delays the > renumbering until nday 1 so that all proposals from the previous week > will take effect first. I was more concerned with proposals that failed quorum and/or were proposed after the deadline to make the previous nweek's ballot, but I guess if the authors can't fix them in the 8 ndays they'd have to do so then their newly meaningless proposals can just be voted down. -- Geoffrey Spear http://www.geoffreyspear.com/ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss