Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:45:50 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Blatant Bribery


On Dec 17, 2007 11:43 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Dec 17, 2007 9:38 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 17, 2007 11:09 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I will gladly divide and pay all my macks to the players who vote FOR
> > > proposal 214 (sequential rule numbering), which is on the ballot again
> > > this week, if that proposal passes.
> >
> > Fix it to empower the MoC to change any references to rule numbers in
> > Pending proposals to point to the newly-correct rule numbers (or have
> > a rule allow such old rule numbers to be used to unambiguously refer
> > to the rules they used to refer to) and I'll vote for it.
> >
> The fix I just posted should take care of this. It delays the
> renumbering until nday 1 so that all proposals from the previous week
> will take effect first.

I was more concerned with proposals that failed quorum and/or were
proposed after the deadline to make the previous nweek's ballot, but I
guess if the authors can't fix them in the 8 ndays they'd have to do
so then their newly meaningless proposals can just be voted down.

-- 
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss