Roger Hicks on Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:41:30 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Usurping Revised |
On Dec 17, 2007 9:33 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Dec 17, 2007 11:28 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This proposal eliminates that forced vacancy. > > I didn't notice that, which is why I don't like when proposals give > the complete text of a new rule rather then specifying the changes... > It was in the notes of my original version, but for the sake of brevity I didn't repost it. I try not to post the complete text of an amended rule unless I am making significant enough changes to that rule that the situation warrants it. I think this is one of those cases. BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss