Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Usurping Revised

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

I can see how both interpretations (but mostly Wooble's) would be valid. It
is still nday 1 even when the clock has not been turned on. The nweek value
got changed at 0:00 UTC regardless. My suggestion would be to change the
phrase "for the entire nweek" to something slightly more awkward, such as
"at all times during the nweek when the clock was On"

Billy Pilgrim

On Dec 17, 2007 11:28 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Dec 17, 2007 9:27 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Dec 17, 2007 9:19 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Dec 17, 2007 11:15 AM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > {{
> > > > At the end of each nweek, a Minister who has held a Ministry for the
> > > > entire nweek earns 50 macks (or 10 macks if the Ministry is a
> > > > mini-Ministry).
> > > > }}
> > >
> > > It's impossible to hold a Ministry for an entire nweek.  All
> > > Ministries are vacant at the start of an nweek, so there's always a
> > > portion of the nweek during which any Minister didn't hold that
> > > Ministry.
> > >
> > This proposal eliminates that forced vacancy.
> >
> > BobTHJ
> >
> Also, I would consider a minister to have held a ministry for the
> entire nweek if they held it before the clock was turned on (since
> this act is what seems to start the nweek). Do you have a different
> interpretation?
>
> BobTHJ
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss