0x44 on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:31:22 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating ministries |
comex wrote: > On 12/10/07, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Maybe we need to enact some Point of Order mechanism to halt play, sort >> things out, and to quickly fix things as needed. If we have to resort to an >> emergency anytime there is a snafu, this game will run at the speed of >> dripping molasses. >> > Tweaks, anyone? > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > Proposal 223 will amend rule 1-10 to require 2 support to declare a game action invalid. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss