0x44 on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:31:22 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] vacating ministries


comex wrote:
> On 12/10/07, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> Maybe we need to enact some Point of Order mechanism to halt play, sort
>> things out, and to quickly fix things as needed. If we have to resort to an
>> emergency anytime there is a snafu, this game will run at the speed of
>> dripping molasses.
>>     
> Tweaks, anyone?
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>   
Proposal 223 will amend rule 1-10 to require 2 support to declare a game
action invalid.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss