Re: [s-d] [s-b] Voting + Some Game Actions

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You can't usurp the Ministry of Goods. You are already the Artisan.

--
0x44;



Justin Ahmann wrote:
> I usurp the Ministry of Questions.
>
> I usurp the Ministry of Goods.
>
> Codae
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: B-Nomic Business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, December 9, 2007 11:37:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Voting + Some Game Actions
>
> I object to your usurpation of the Ministry of Questions.
>
> --
> 0x44;
>
>
>
> Jamie Dallaire wrote:
>   
>> The Oracle continues to defy me.
>>
>> I usurp the Ministry of Questions.
>>
>> Billy Pilgrim
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2007 11:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  
>>     
>>> On Dec 9, 2007 7:57 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>    
>>>       
>>>> You are entirely correct about the Proposal Numbers, Oracle. I did mean
>>>>      
>>>>         
>>> to
>>>    
>>>       
>>>> speak of Proposal 212. Your Proposal 202, however, was not included
>>>>      
>>>>         
>>> because
>>>    
>>>       
>>>> its effects pale beside the might of Proposal 212, by which they are
>>>> engulfed mercilessly.
>>>>
>>>> That said, Oracle, I bid you to explain why you find my Consultations to
>>>>      
>>>>         
>>> be
>>>    
>>>       
>>>> unworthy, and to explain how I may correct them to bring their worth to
>>>>      
>>>>         
>>> an
>>>    
>>>       
>>>> acceptable level.
>>>>      
>>>>         
>>> Partially because they were not phrased in the form of Questions.
>>>
>>> Of course, I'm happy to admit that it was mostly because I'm not
>>> afraid to abuse the power granted to me by the rules for the greater
>>> good of maintaining the integrity of the democratic process.  It was
>>> clearly not the will of the voters that the game cease to be called "B
>>> Nomic" and if you can exploit one loophole in the Rules to try to
>>> subvert that will I'm happy to exploit other loopholes to see that
>>> it's not subverted.
>>>
>>>    
>>>       
>>>> Note that the Rules do not bind me to submitting a single Consultation
>>>>      
>>>>         
>>> per
>>>    
>>>       
>>>> declaration of invalidity.
>>>>
>>>> Also note that unless you explain your ZOTTING satisfactorily, I shall
>>>>      
>>>>         
>>> usurp
>>>    
>>>       
>>>> your position as Minister of Questions. No doubt all Players will agree
>>>>      
>>>>         
>>> that
>>>    
>>>       
>>>> these Consultations must be seen through.
>>>>      
>>>>         
>>> True, but I'd say if I can't muster a second Objection from somewhere
>>> then my intuition about the will of the Players is clearly wrong, and
>>> I'd then welcome an Oracularity declaring that the game shall
>>> henceforth no longer be called B Nomic and that we still have a
>>> Membership Test defined even if it's not used.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Geoffrey Spear
>>> http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>>
>>>    
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-business mailing list
>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>>  
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>   
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss