Re: [s-d] Transclusion and History don't mix

Mike McGann on Sun, 9 Dec 2007 20:27:35 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Transclusion and History don't mix

To: "B Nomic - Discussion" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Transclusion and History don't mix
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 22:19:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <6d741b990712091915xa963389ofc9cbf2f49aeeca0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6d741b990712091915xa963389ofc9cbf2f49aeeca0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Link no longer valid as it was reverted :-)

- Hose

On Dec 9, 2007 10:15 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is good reason to vote for or to refine BobTHJ's sequential rule
> number proposal:
>
> (see Rule 1-17 on 1-Oct-2007)
>
> http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=Rules&oldid=2995
>
> - Hose
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] Transclusion and History don't mix
  - From: Mike McGann

Prev by Date: [s-d] Transclusion and History don't mix
Next by Date: [s-d] Recommendation for Message of the nweek
Previous by thread: [s-d] Transclusion and History don't mix
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] Transclusion and History don't mix
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread