Jamie Dallaire on Fri, 7 Dec 2007 04:06:02 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Some Game Actions |
On Dec 6, 2007 6:39 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To answer your questions: > > <this question is a sentence fragment and thus has no answer> > > Mine > > I don't know. If it is legal to transfer Panic Buttons, I have not. > Otherwise, I have. > > I also submit the following Consultations: > > { > I write "X" on my Panic Button. is valid. > } > > { > I give my Panic Button to Goethe. is valid. > } > > { > I give my Panic Button to Wonko. is valid. > } > > { > I press pikhq's Panic Button, turning it On. is valid. > } > > { > Question: Should the above Consultations, based on the Rules, be ZOTTED? > Reasoning: The format is explicitly condoned in Rule 1-10, but the format > also appears malformed (to the Supplicant). > Unbeliever: BobTHJ > } > The above Consultations are, with ascending Consultation Numbers from Top to Bottom of Codae's message, Consultations Number 59 to 63. As MoQ, I ZOT Consultations Number 59, 60, 61, and 62. Reasoning, which applies to each ZOTTING: This consultation is malformed because it contains ungrammatical sentence fragments. I assign Consultation Number 63 to Priest *Hose*. Despite the fact that the specific consultations referred to above have already been ZOTTED, the question in itself could apply to future cases. Billy Pilgrim _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss