Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 134

0x44 on Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:57:27 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 134

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 134
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:58:19 -0600
In-reply-to: <56732cfd0712060731k39d49402t5a03683f3d3a9177@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6d741b990712052057n3e4a5265l3b2b0432881ce5a1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0712060731k39d49402t5a03683f3d3a9177@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071022)


Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> 184: I've got the healing (0x44)
>>     
> AGAINST (too much paperwork)
>   
Why do you think recovering a single hit point per nday if you have had
your hit points reduced requires too much paperwork?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 134
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Usurping Revised
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Usurping Revised
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 134
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 134
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread