Re: [s-d] [s-b] Codae's Refresh Proposal

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah, we're still several claims short. That said, we have until the end of
the pause and then till the start of nday 12 (this is if we don't change the
state of the clock with an RP...) and I've intended all along to start
pushing for people to declare it inconsistent if we get back to normal
gametime and haven't zotted waiting consultations or lowered quorum with an
RP.

Billy Pilgrim

On Nov 30, 2007 8:04 AM, Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Erm, no, three claims short for that.
> Sorry, keeping up with the last couple weeks of mail + backlog has been
> a bit hard
>
> Antonio Dolcetta wrote:
> > Did anyone actually count the claims ?
> > I thought it would be overturned
> >
> >
> > Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> >
> >> In any case, I don't believe this Oracularity solves the actual
> >> problem, which is that there will soon be a Pondered Consultation that
> >> states unequivocally that any Player can Create a Blueprint (and/or,
> >> in the rather liberal interpretation of the Answer that might not be
> >> borne out by the actual Answer, do absolutely anything they want at
> >> any time).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss