Re: [s-d] List of factions

William Berard on Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:23:50 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] List of factions

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] List of factions
From: "William Berard" <william.berard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:23:46 +0000
In-reply-to: <474AC522.3030009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <474A0D3E.2060609@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200711252132.02411.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650711252033l6418f44cg7aa968e595082d83@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200711252136.07237.josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> <474AC522.3030009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 11/26/07, 0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Consultation 48 states that a Game Object cannot be both a Player and a
> Faction.



I'm so proud of having nailed this one ;)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] List of factions
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

References:
- [s-d] List of factions
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] List of factions
  - From: Josiah Worcester
- Re: [s-d] List of factions
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] List of factions
  - From: Josiah Worcester
- Re: [s-d] List of factions
  - From: 0x4461736864617368

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Registration, consultation, proposal
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 52
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] List of factions
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] List of factions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread