Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation done right.

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

I believe that the name Agora would be ambiguous, confusing, and would
in every way possible damage the integrity of the game.  I therefore
disallow the External Force known as Agora to become a Player.

The beliefs of non-Registrar players to the contrary are irrelevant
under the current rules.

--Registrar Wooble

On Nov 24, 2007 7:10 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I retract the following consultation, if possible:
> {
> Registrar Wooble does not have the power to allow Agora to become a player by
> Rule 1-4
> }
>
> I submit the following consultation:
> {
> Does Registrar Wooble have the power to refuse Agora as a player by Rule 1-4?
> }
> Unbeliever: Wooble
> Arguments:
>
> "The Registrar may refuse to allow any External Force to become a
> player, and may refuse to recognize any otherwise-legal name change, if e
> believes the External Force's proposed name (or existing player's new name)
> would be ambiguous or confusing, or could otherwise damage the integrity of
> this game."
>
> This does not give the Registrar carte blanche license to refuse a new player:
> this only gives the Registrar the power to refuse a name that is ambiguous,
> confusing, or damages the integrity of the game. Since Agora is none of
> these, the Registrar does not have the power to refuse Agora's status as a
> player under this rule.
>
> There is no other rule that gives the Registrar the power to refuse a new
> player.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss