Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on Goods

Jamie Dallaire on Sun, 25 Nov 2007 05:15:04 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on Goods

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on Goods
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:14:58 -0500
In-reply-to: <6bf32280711241655i79a77bcerb473f4f3885dd674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <cf0c2a990711241307v52b55fe5v32c053aaa6738929@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650711241501i1637497bt37ce0c31cfe02227@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <33dd05c30711241600i32e0272etafd3ccb1b59d9a15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280711241655i79a77bcerb473f4f3885dd674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I will not ZOT this consultation because the rules on consultations
specifically allow consultations to be answered by the words True or False,
which apply to statements. These are equivalent to, respectively, Yes or No.

Billy Pilgrim

On Nov 24, 2007 7:55 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This needs zotting for not being a question.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on Goods
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on Goods
  - From: Aaron Coquet
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on Goods
  - From: comex

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Give Ministries Their Props
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on Goods
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on Goods
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on Goods
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread