Re: [s-d] [s-b] Answer to Consultation 39

[Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Friday 23 November 2007 11:47:01 Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> This is Consultation Number 42 and I assign it to Priest Wonko.
> I would ZOT this consultation since the AFO submitted a rather identical one
> with more arguments, but the validity of the AFO consultation is in
> question.
> 
> Billy Pilgrim
> 
> On Nov 22, 2007 10:27 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Nov 22, 2007 8:14 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Interesting. I'm not sure how to do it, but if we decide to allow
> > > non-singular-humans to gain playerhood, we might need some way of *not*
> > > allowing them to play simultaneously as both a player and a faction...
> > > Perhaps eliminate the concept of a faction altogether?
> > >
> > > Billy Pilgrim
> > >
> > It appears the AFO is both a Player and a Faction. I submit the
> > following consutation:
> > {
> > The AFO is both a Player and a Faction at the same time, true or false?
> > }
> >
> > If this is true, then each Ballotday, the AFO's vote power is set to 1
> > (or 0 if they give allegience), and at the beginning of each nweek,
> > it's vote power is set to 3/4 of it's previous value. Also, players
> > may give allegiance to the AFO.
> >
> > BobTHJ
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> 

I submit the arguments that the AFO used for his consultation for this 
consultation, just so Wonko has a bit more to work with.

The AFO proclaims that he would like to remain alive.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss