Re: [s-d] [s-b] Registration, consultation, proposal

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Well, I pretty much agree with you in terms of the so-called "legal
fiction". And my basic position with regards to whether AFO is a player or
not according to B's rules is pretty much spelled out in my consultation.
I'd submit a claim but as the supplicant, I can't. If you choose to do so
you have 3 ndays.

Billy Pilgrim

PS: There are lots of new consultations out today and I unfortunately have
much work to get done for tomorrow. Will surely get them sorted and assigned
and all that good stuff by tomorrow sometime.

On Nov 22, 2007 11:45 PM, Kerim Aydin <kerim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> > Goethe, if you disagree with the ruling, you could always submit an
> official
> > claim as to the answer's consistency with established doctrine...
> >
> > Billy Pilgrim
>
> Thanks for the suggestion!  As a newbie, before I make this formal
> I'm wondering what longer-time players (other than the AFO members and
> myself) might think about the varied arguments.
>
> -Goethe
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss