Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:47:18 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Man Very Early Made Jars Stand Up Nearly


Oh, hey, Wonko, sorry if *I* came across sounding wrong. I really didn't
mean to offend you - or make you think you had offended me. I was just
trying my darndest to be a good MiniMinister of Arguments by contradicting
the previous post by the MetaMin! Especially since he had just suggested
someone else should have the job... ;-)

In fact I quite liked your comment and am in fact in full agreement with it.
And as for being inactive I completely understand, busy periods happen to
everyone. No pressure, seriously.

Again, sorry for the misunderstanding! I gotta take this MiniMin thing
easy...

Cheers,

Billy Pilgrim

On Nov 13, 2007 11:38 AM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I apologize if that's how I come across. I used to be much more
> active in the game, but lately real life has intervened to an
> alarming extent and I haven't have as much to devote to this game as
> I have in past years. I would love to contribute more to the game,
> but these days I barely have enough time to read all the emails each
> nday, much less generate any useful proposals.
>
> I didn't mean to offend anyone with my comment about the proposed
> phrase of the nweek; however, I do feel that messing with the voting
> system by e.g. charging money for votes is quite in keeping with the
> spirit of the game. I can't speak for current players, but I can tell
> you that it fits with B Nomic's history, almost all of which I have
> been witness to. I meant no disrespect to the game or to Antonio;
> indeed, this mentality is one of my favorite parts of the game.
>
> As for my official "inactive" status, this is because the last two
> voting periods have coincided with project deadlines. Hopefully this
> won't happen in the future.
>
> --
> Wonko
>
> On Nov 7, 2007, at 10:37 PM, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
>
> > Actually, it seems appropriate that Wonko should be the MiniMinister
> > of Abuse. It seems brash criticism of our game and the ideas that
> > originate therein is all that can motivate this inactive player to
> > post.
> >
> > Billy Pilgrim
> >
> > On Nov 7, 2007 4:27 PM, 0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On the contrary, it seems perfectly in keeping with the spirit of
> >>> our game :-P
> >>>
> >>
> >> Perhaps I should have appointed you the MiniMinister of Argument.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> spoon-discuss mailing list
> >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss