Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:47:18 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Man Very Early Made Jars Stand Up Nearly |
Oh, hey, Wonko, sorry if *I* came across sounding wrong. I really didn't mean to offend you - or make you think you had offended me. I was just trying my darndest to be a good MiniMinister of Arguments by contradicting the previous post by the MetaMin! Especially since he had just suggested someone else should have the job... ;-) In fact I quite liked your comment and am in fact in full agreement with it. And as for being inactive I completely understand, busy periods happen to everyone. No pressure, seriously. Again, sorry for the misunderstanding! I gotta take this MiniMin thing easy... Cheers, Billy Pilgrim On Nov 13, 2007 11:38 AM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I apologize if that's how I come across. I used to be much more > active in the game, but lately real life has intervened to an > alarming extent and I haven't have as much to devote to this game as > I have in past years. I would love to contribute more to the game, > but these days I barely have enough time to read all the emails each > nday, much less generate any useful proposals. > > I didn't mean to offend anyone with my comment about the proposed > phrase of the nweek; however, I do feel that messing with the voting > system by e.g. charging money for votes is quite in keeping with the > spirit of the game. I can't speak for current players, but I can tell > you that it fits with B Nomic's history, almost all of which I have > been witness to. I meant no disrespect to the game or to Antonio; > indeed, this mentality is one of my favorite parts of the game. > > As for my official "inactive" status, this is because the last two > voting periods have coincided with project deadlines. Hopefully this > won't happen in the future. > > -- > Wonko > > On Nov 7, 2007, at 10:37 PM, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > > > Actually, it seems appropriate that Wonko should be the MiniMinister > > of Abuse. It seems brash criticism of our game and the ideas that > > originate therein is all that can motivate this inactive player to > > post. > > > > Billy Pilgrim > > > > On Nov 7, 2007 4:27 PM, 0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > >> > >>> On the contrary, it seems perfectly in keeping with the spirit of > >>> our game :-P > >>> > >> > >> Perhaps I should have appointed you the MiniMinister of Argument. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> spoon-discuss mailing list > >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-discuss mailing list > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss