Re: [s-d] Game Action: Submitting a Consultation

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

True enough. Nonetheless, it was a malformed question.

On Nov 9, 2007 3:21 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Friday 09 November 2007, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> > 2) I deem this Consultation to be no longer relevant. It was intended to
> > challenge the attempted creation, by Artisan Hose, of a Blueprint which
> > has already been defeated by receiving two Objections.
>
> I'd consider it central to Rule 2-8's interpretation and therefore always
> relevant.
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss