Re: [s-d] What is the point?

comex on Mon, 5 Nov 2007 19:14:50 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] What is the point?

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] What is the point?
From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:14:21 -0500
In-reply-to: <472FCD10.7090803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200711052035.26299.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <200711052106.35805.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <472FCD10.7090803@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7

On Monday 05 November 2007, 0x4461736864617368 wrote:
> In that case, I'm going to have to object to your second attempt. ;)
But the question is, which attempt was performed second?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] What is the point?
  - From: 0x4461736864617368

References:
- Re: [s-d] What is the point?
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] What is the point?
  - From: 0x4461736864617368

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] What is the point?
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] What is the point?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] What is the point?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] What is the point?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread