Mike McGann on Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:55:04 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Bait and switch |
On 10/31/07, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Excellent. This is basically what I meant. The only flood I'm afraid of, > though, is not one that would happen at this moment, but rather in the last > 30 minutes before proposals become open for voting. Think sniping, on ebay. > "My proposals can squash yours solely because I submitted them 2 minutes > from the end. I literally just got the last word." That type of thing. Yeah, a sniping flood is not a good thing and should not be encouraged. The fundamental problem is that a proposal that can create an action that targets a proposal can lead to this situation. Another variation on the theme is that a proposal number could be used as a trump card (I hope Wooble doesn't object to the card analogy). For example, submitting a blank (or meaningless) proposal at the very beginning of the nweek and revising right before voting to target a proposal and getting precedence because of the lower proposal number. - Hose _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss