Re: [s-d] Proposal: de-Spivakify Ruleset

comex on Fri, 10 Aug 2007 04:03:19 +0200 (CEST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Proposal: de-Spivakify Ruleset

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Proposal: de-Spivakify Ruleset
From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 22:03:01 -0400
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650708091855i74cc5272k96399ac56d54ac85@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <cf0c2a990708080806p1e7262e1pe4cfd5e83897d829@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200708092012.57332.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650708091855i74cc5272k96399ac56d54ac85@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7

On Thursday 09 August 2007, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> I don't know that it will *pass* >>> in fact I'm thinking of voting
> against it. Sounds like hassle with not much benefit. But IF it
> passes...
Sorry.  I replied a bit too fast.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] Proposal: de-Spivakify Ruleset
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] Proposal: de-Spivakify Ruleset
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Proposal: de-Spivakify Ruleset
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Legislative Dominance don't come cheap
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Proposal: de-Spivakify Ruleset
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] Proposal: de-Spivakify Ruleset
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread