Re: [s-d] [s-b] Oracle Report 22/06/07

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 6/22/07, bd_ <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Consultation 17
> > Supplicant: Antonio
> > Question:
> > {
> > Supposing there are two
> > Players, say A and B, where A is a single human being and B is a group
> > of human beings that contains A, then if A and B vote for the same
> > proposal only the most recent vote is counted. True or false ?
> > }
> > Reasoning:
> > {
> > B nomic has traditionally enforced the idea "one man, one vote"
> > If
> > a Primo style corporation were allowed to become a player any entity
> > who is a player by itself and is also part of the corporation would
> > have a number of votes >1
> > Bear with me here:
> > rule 2-2 states:
> > - Any Player may submit a Vote on an Open proposal at any time. ...
> > - The most recent Vote on a proposal by a Player is called that
> > - player's Final Vote on that proposal
> > the intent clearly being to allow only one vote from each player.
> > by Rule 1-4
> > - A Player is an Outsider
> > and by Rule 1-3
> > - An Outsider is an External Force
> > So going back to the consultation's example Player A who is part of B is
> > actually resubmitting his Final vote
> >
> > through B.
> > }
> > UNOFFICIAL Answered: FALSE 21 Jun 2007 21:00:03 -0600 (on discussion forum)
> > UNOFFICIAL Answer claimed inconsistent by Antonio 22 Jun 2007 10:43:42
> > +0200 (consultation 17 has not been officially answered)
>
> I intend to claim this consistent when it is posted to the business
> forum.  Nowhere has A agreed to allow B's representative to override A's
> votes, and if A is said representative, then A isn't claiming to change
> their own votes anyway, so at worst A is attempting an illegal game
> action.
>

I reposted this to the public forum a few hours ago.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss