Re: [s-d] [s-b] Oracle Report 22/06/07

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 6/22/07, bd_ <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > -o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-
> >
> > Consultation 11
> >
> > Supplicant: Comex
> >  > True or false: Is Primo Corporation a player?
> >
> > Assigned to: BobTHJ
> > Answered: TRUE 21/06/2007 18.26
> > Answer claimed inconsistent by Antonio 22 Jun 2007 10:43:42 +0200
> >
> > Priest' Reasoning:
> > With respect & apologies to Priest Wonko, I judge TRUE. Primo
> > Corporation satisfied all the requirements for becoming a player per
> > this Priest's "mystical interpretation of the rules":
> > * Primo is an External Force. It's existance is not tied to B Nomic.
> > It existed prior to it's joining B Nomic.
> > * It posted a message to the public forum requesting to become a
> > player, and designated the name it wished to be known by.
> > * It was not already a Player.
> > * It has a working e-mail address, the address of it's Corporate Forum.
> > * It is capable of passing a Turning Test, see below.
>
> I claim this is INCONSISTENT. While Primo Corporation is an external
> force capable of passing a turing test, and it has a working email, it
> has not posted to a public forum to join. Indeed, no rule authorizes an
> officer of Primo corporation to cause it to take action in B Nomic at
> all.
>

Are you referring to B Nomic rules? or the Primo Corporation rules?
Primo Corporation Shareholders did indeed authorize it's Officer
(myself) to act on it's behalf in declaring it a player. See Issue #11
at:
http://groups.google.com/group/primo-corporation/browse_thread/thread/aea2550bfd4c46a7

Of course, no rule in B Nomic specifically allows me to act on behalf
of Primo Corporation, but I would argue that it doesn't need to.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss