Roger Hicks on Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:32:30 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Voting

> I'm open to the idea of being "protected" by another nomic, I just
> disapprove of the methods they used to get that position (namely, that
> a rule change meant to help us fix the game was instead used to take
> over the game, and then to repeal itself). While I don't approve of
> rule 1, I don't want to cut off diplomatic relations with Agora
> either.
> --
> Wonko

I suppose I should take a moment and publicly apologize for my hasty
takeover attempt. It was meant to be all in good fun. As B Nomic had
been idle for the past few months, I honestly didn't think anyone
would care. it wasn't my intention to step on anyone's toes.

As a player of both B Nomic and Agora, I truly believe that both could
benefit from each other. Let me assure those of you who are concerned
about Agora serving as dictator that such is not the case. Agora is
restricted to making changes to B Nomic only with a 2/3 majority, and
even then it is limited to those actions which are beneficial and will
lead to a preservation of B Nomic.

I am also in favor of bd_'s idea of making B Nomic a player of Agora,
which could easily be done, and would provide B Nomic with some
representation, so as to prevent a one-way relationship.

spoon-discuss mailing list